Hi,
It would be easy to modify the ITSM Email Integration I offer to use a
keyword instead of an email address - it has the facility to do templates
for Incident creation.
Let me know if you are interested in this avenue.

Cheers
Carl

www. missingpiecessoftware.com
 On 15 Oct 2013 12:33, "Randeep Atwal" <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
> Hi Kathy
>
> As Roger said, there is some functionality included with ITSM 8 that does
> this.  So if you have a server with ITSM 8 installed you could do a few
> things:
>
> 1.  Are you considering upgrading to ITSM 8 – there are many major
> enhancements you would also gain as well as generating tickets based on
> email content.
> 2.  If not, you could install ITSM 8 and take a look at the workflow,
> create a def of the needed components, import it to your environment and
> make the necessary tweaks to get it functional.
> 3.  You could build something very simple yourself by doing roughly the
> following steps:
>
> Provision a new mailbox for a system user (could be named after how you
> brand ITSM in your organization.)  (you could create multiple email boxes
> as well – see why you may want to below..)
>
> Configure a new 'incoming' email box using the ARSystem Email
> Configuration (you can read the manual's for details on how to do this)  -
> it will include details such as polling interval, mail server, credentials.
>  It differs slightly based on platform, there is plenty of documentation to
> be found on this.
>
> At this point, sending an email to the new mailbox will create a record in
> the ARSystem Email Messages form.
>
> At this point it becomes a regular AR Development thing.
>
> You can put a filter that operates on submit against the ARSystem Email
> Messages form to copy the incoming email and it's attachments to a staging
> form.  I recommend you do this since trying to create a ticket
> synchronously will affect the speed at which incoming mail arrives which
> can be a long term scalability problem as your incoming email volume
> increases.  Also if there is some hard workflow error, the whole
> transaction rolls back making it hard to troubleshoot.
>
> Once you have the email in a staging form, you can put an escalation that
> runs with a one minute frequency against the form and does a setfield
> against a field you have reserved – you can set it to "RUN" for example.
>
> Then you have a filter that runs on Modify with a qualification of
> 'TR.Special Field' = "RUN"
>
> At this point, the filter can take a few different approaches.  Data
> driving what happens would be a good idea as opposed to building different
> filters for different rules such as the 'provisioning' one you mention.
>
> On an email you will have:
>
> 1.  The mailbox name the email was sent to
> 2.  The senders email address
> 3.  Subject Line
> 4.  Body
> 5.  Attachment
>
> From the use case you mention, you are looking for a keyword to indicate
> that the email contains provisioning, if so route to group x.
>
> I would assume that you can educate your users that if their Subject Line
> starts with Provisioning, and they send to this email box, it will create a
> ticket and assign it to provisioning.
>
> So you could build a form with these columns:
>
> 1.EmailBox
> 2. Subject Keyword
> 3.  Assigned Group
> 4.  Assigned Company
> 5.  Assigned Organization
>
> Or if you wanted to be more flexible, you could say:
>
> 1.EmailBox
> 2. Subject Keyword
> 3.  Incident Template ID (Referencing an Incident Template ID)  - this
> allow you to even categorize the ticket, apply impact, urgency and priority
> by modifying the template associated.
>
>
> So you build a filter looking up the needed values, based on your incoming
> data.  If you are on a case sensitive platform, converting all to lower
> case is a good idea.  You will essentially be wildcarding if you use
> subject line, but if you set up different mailboxes for different routing
> requirements, it is easier to have exact matching if you can educate users
> to send to different email boxes based on what is needed.
>
> Hope this helps you figure out a way forward…
>
> Randeep
>
>
>
>
> From: Kathy Morris <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:28:50 -0400
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Email Workflow Generate HPD Ticket
>
> **
>
> ******
>
> We are on 7.6.4 AR System/ITSM – is this done through email templates with
> 7.6.4?  I did not see this on the communities – I saw lots of email
> questions, but not the code specific to building this workflow.  If anyone
> can shed some light on how this can be done, it would be greatly
> appreciated.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Rjustice
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:03 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Email Workflow Generate HPD Ticket****
>
> ** **
>
> ** ****
>
> There is a rules based email engine the was released with ARS/ITSM 8 that
> allows this to be done. The original code may be on communities.****
>
> ** **
>
> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*****
>
>
>
> Kathy Morris <[email protected]> wrote:****
>
> Hi,****
>
>  ****
>
> We have a requirement to generate Incident tickets based on email
> content.  Example:  if the email starts with “Provisioning” then
> automatically route the ticket to the provisioning team.   Is this a
> complex task to do? Would I use the email template workflow or is there a
> better way to do this? We are hoping to complete this within 1 week – or
> should we plan on more time for this type of integration?****
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ ****
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to