My comment echos Daniel's. Getting 150 MHz reference oscillators is a special order. What's the motivation to switch to 150 MHz?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Kristin Beck via ARTIQ < [email protected]> wrote: > I already have a 100MHz (non-programmable) clock in the lab, so I prefer > to continue supporting that in all levels (firmware, hardware, etc.) in the > long term. That said, the workarounds are not too onerous for getting up > and running initially--either Dan's suggestion of a non-standard 150MHz > clock or Tom's suggestion of modifying the dividers in our lab-specific > bitstream build would allow us to see full performance in the lab for > device testing. > > Best, > Kristi Beck > > _______________________________________________ > ARTIQ mailing list > https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq > >
_______________________________________________ ARTIQ mailing list https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq
