> I think we can safely assume I knew that since I both included > examples of it in my posting and explained about how the "+" was > required in asciidoc for multi-paragraph list items. ;) > > The "+" is a bit ugly, but the main problem I have with the > continuaion is that after the "+" line you must unindent. Indentation > is not optional at that point in the list item: it's forbidden. In > some places in a list, indentation is allowed, in other places it's > not. I like the indentation in my source to reflect the structure of > the document. Asciidoc doesn't allow that in some places.
Hi Stuart, Whilst I don't have a problem with the + and many types of paragraphs can be indented, I do find it a bit annoying to not be able to indent literal blocks in the source. OTOH I understand that making asciidoc accept block markups that don't start in column 1 could break old documents, but it could be enabled by a command line option. My use case is similar to Grant's, ie enumerated list of instructions with a sentence of text and a literal command block. As a matter of style (actually of human cognitive limitations) any complex explanations are deferred to later sections using a (for details see ...). That way users can easily step through the steps, especially after the first time, or can consult the expansive :-) details at a click on the link. Cheers Lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
