On 28 June 2011 02:15, Gary Funck <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/27/11 17:15:53, Lex Trotman wrote: >> I don't know enough Latex to know if it *has* to be the same but I >> would point out that asciidoc-dblatex.sty hasn't been changed since >> 2008, I'm sure someone has used it since then :-) >> Doesn't complain for me dblatex version 0.2.12-4 latex version: > > The complaint is in the .log file left behind by dblatex (pdflatex). > You'll need to run dblatex with debugging on so that it keeps > its temporary output directory around: > > a2x -v -k -f pdf --dblatex-opts='-d' asciidoc-test.txt > > After running, it will print a message something like: > > 'asciidoc-test.pdf' successfully built > /tmp/tmpr28RWn not removed > > Look in /tmp/tmpr28RWn/asciidoc-test.log for the warning message. > > Lex: pdfTeX 3.1415926-1.40.10-2.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) > GF: pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6) > GF: rpm: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc14.x86_64 > >> Is there something about your dblatex or tex version that is more picky? > > Dunno. Try the instructions above to replicate.
Yes it happens. I suspect its just nobodies ever looked in that file before. I'm not sure what the implications of changing the package name are, better leave that to Stuart. Cheers Lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
