On 28/06/11 05:48, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 28 June 2011 02:15, Gary Funck<[email protected]> wrote:
On 06/27/11 17:15:53, Lex Trotman wrote:
I don't know enough Latex to know if it *has* to be the same but I
would point out that asciidoc-dblatex.sty hasn't been changed since
2008, I'm sure someone has used it since then :-)
Doesn't complain for me dblatex version 0.2.12-4 latex version:
The complaint is in the .log file left behind by dblatex (pdflatex).
You'll need to run dblatex with debugging on so that it keeps
its temporary output directory around:
a2x -v -k -f pdf --dblatex-opts='-d' asciidoc-test.txt
After running, it will print a message something like:
'asciidoc-test.pdf' successfully built
/tmp/tmpr28RWn not removed
Look in /tmp/tmpr28RWn/asciidoc-test.log for the warning message.
Lex: pdfTeX 3.1415926-1.40.10-2.2 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)
GF: pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6)
GF: rpm: texlive-latex-2007-56.fc14.x86_64
Is there something about your dblatex or tex version that is more picky?
Dunno. Try the instructions above to replicate.
Yes it happens.
I suspect its just nobodies ever looked in that file before.
I'm not sure what the implications of changing the package name are,
better leave that to Stuart.
I don't have an answer off the top of my head, as far as I can tell it's benign.
Cheers, Stuart
Cheers
Lex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
