On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 6 July 2011 20:08, Dag Wieers <[email protected]> wrote:
In both cases Question two is not part of the qanda list, it's a new labeled
list on its own.
Making the comment part of the 'answer-block' does work, but still, people
shouldn't know these kind of workarounds. Comment's should probably be
ignored /filtered pre-processing ?
The use of inline comments instead of block comments within lists is
documented in http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/userguide.html#X64.
Since line comments can be exposed by the showcomments attribute and
both types are passed through to the docbook backend, arbitrary
deletion isn't appropriate.
Hmmm, I have a few 'comments' about that :)
- I still think that the behaviour is very disturbing, even when
documented
- I wonder why comments need to go to the backend, because I do not
expect comments to be processed and translated to a back-end comment
(In fact, I was expecting comments to not appear in the final output,
they may contain confidential or private information !)
- I could not find any information about inline comments in the AsciiDoc
document or what effect it has, could you elaborate ?
Thanks for your reply !
--
-- dag wieers, [email protected], http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, [email protected], http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
