On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Stuart Rackham wrote:
On 13/12/11 11:51, Dag Wieers wrote:
Right, but that should not be a problem if the old behavior is possible by
the default 'options'.
In that case, only annotation-style would show the new behavior. That's
what I meant before with: making the old behavior optional (but
default).
Ok, there is no 'comment' option but there is a 'skip' option. So change the
hardwired "skip attributes list if comment block syntax" to "skip if 'skip'
option is set".
Problem is that there's a Catch 22: You need to read and process the
attribute list to determine if you should read and process the attribute
list.
So needed to process attributes list and then un-process it if there is a
'skip' option, quite tricky.
Thanks for clarifying. I understand that I may oversimplify my wishes to
stay away from understanding what asciidoc is doing under the hood ;-) But
I am very grateful for your help and feedback !
It's in the trunk, hope it doesn't introduce any regressions:
http://code.google.com/p/asciidoc/source/detail?r=320117a96e0ac6ae260a934ec74c967dbc5a5686
I will test right away !
--
-- dag wieers, [email protected], http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, [email protected], http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
