Dear Lex and Gour, What is your suggestion? contacting the dblatex or the asciidoc maintainer.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 April 2012 20:05, Gour <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:22:33 +1000 > > Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Looking at that you should only need to set the SGML_CATALOG_FILES > >> environmant variable properly rather than editing the dblatex source. > > > > Well, now I know about it, but it may be that not all AsciiDoc users > > running Archlinux are following this mailing list and might be surprised > > by long processing time and even abandon AsciiDoc due to it. > > Yes, it applies to any dbaltex user. I wasn't suggesting that the OP > should not take your suggestion to file a bug report to Arch. > > Without looking in detail it seems that Arch has moved the catalogs > without adjusting packages like dblatex that use them. Thats not > good, but distro makers are only human and make mistakes :) > > Cheers > Lex > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
