On 7 June 2012 09:42, Plecebo <[email protected]> wrote: > The extra flag is easy to pass so not a big deal, but I don't see how it is > significantly different then the way --icons works for a2x. > > Examples: > > a2x -f xhtml --icons source.txt > works great the icons are copied over so the generated html file can use > them. This uses the "default" icons that come with asciidoc > > a2x -f xhtml --icons --icons-dir=/path/to/icons source.txt > works the same as above but you can supply your own icons. >
In the cases above the work is done by a2x, not a separate toolchain so we have complete control. > I think this should also work (without passing dblatex flags, since we > already know that we want to include icons) > a2x -f pdf --icons source.txt > > This should work too in order to override the icons > > a2x -f pdf --icons --icons-dir=/path/to/icons source.txt > > Maybe these work with fop, but they don't work with dblatex, unless I'm > missing something. Though this is a small issue, and now that I know how to > properly include the icons in a pdf with dblatex not of a huge concern to > me. The problem is that the user can also specify the -I for purposes other than icons, so where in the order should the system generated -I go? (Note the Python argument parser does not keep the order of different options so the position of --icons-dir relative to --dblatex-opts can't be found). And thanks again for sharing your solution. Cheers Lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
