Thanks a lot, I got that.

2012/11/28 Lex Trotman <[email protected]>

> On 28 November 2012 12:13, 杨荣权 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >      I do have a requirement about the absolute width of a table.
> >      My scenery is: I want to create a HTML table, the some columns must
> be
> > fixed width, otherwise the table became a mass.
> >
> >      Do you have a way to do that? Or report a bug to asciidoc developer.
>
> To re-confirm, you can't use px.  Of course you can report it, but its
> likely to be considered a feature request rather than a bug since
> Asciidoc deliberately moved away from px.  Of course if you can supply
> a patch that allows both px and percent to be used it is more likely
> to be included.
>
> Note that the old deprecated form of tables is still available, but
> since it was before my time with Asciidoc (current tables were
> introduced in 2008) I'm not sure what their syntax is.  It will also
> give you a deprecation warning and may be removed at some time.
>
> Cheers
> Lex
>
> >
> > Jacky
> >
> >
> > 在 2012年11月28日星期三UTC+8上午6时09分42秒,Lex Trotman写道:
> >>
> >> On 27 November 2012 18:28, 杨荣权 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Hi, Guys:
> >> >     I read documentation and investigate the source code, and found
> that
> >> > there is no way to use a fixed width table.
> >> >
> >> > The new table is introduced in ASCIIDOC in version 8.x, the table
> >> > declination is:
> >> > [width="15%"]
> >> > |=======
> >> > |1 |2 |A
> >> > |3 |4 |B
> >> > |5 |6 |C
> >> > |=======
> >> >
> >> > that is not what I want! I just want the old version. For example: the
> >> > table
> >> > width option is 400 pix.
> >> > [width="400"]
> >> > |=======
> >> > |1 |2 |A
> >> > |3 |4 |B
> >> > |5 |6 |C
> >> > |=======
> >> >
> >> > How to do that?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Absolute widths are no longer available, I guess because they are not
> >> portable between backends and media.  And px is also not portable,
> >> 400px on a "retina" display on iPhone/iPod would only be an inch or
> >> so.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Lex
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Jacky
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups
> >> > "asciidoc" group.
> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asciidoc/-/iteqiiLeylcJ.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > [email protected].
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "asciidoc" group.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asciidoc/-/qalKn0xBpa4J.
> >
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "asciidoc" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.

Reply via email to