On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Stuart Rackham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 15/12/12 17:42, Lex Trotman wrote: > > On 15 December 2012 07:38, Dan Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You could also use a replacement attribute, defined in a .conf file > >> > >> [attributes] > >> plus=+ > >> > >> Then refer to it as {plus} > >> > >> I was thinking that plus would be a good candidate for the default > >> replacement set in AsciiDoc. WDYT? > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Maybe, but where to stop defining attributes? > > > > In general, only common ones are defined, remember you can always > > define an attribute in the document header with > > > > :plus: + > > > > for those few documents where its needed, you don't have to define it > > in the conf file. This is better than defining lots of attributes > > which are unused in most documents. > > > Good points, this was going through my head when I acquiesced and added > the {plus}. It's in the trunk now, if there are strong objections I > could take it out before the next release. > I think when it's a symbol that has significant meaning in AsciiDoc, it's worth having an attribute substitute for it. + appears frequently in the AsciiDoc syntax, so I think it's a good decision. -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
