Stéphane Gourichon <stephane.gourichon@...> writes: > > Le 02/07/2013 12:16, Lauri Kasanen a écrit : > > Sure, I could do that, but the point of the request was to make it > > default, so everyone could benefit. > > I understand the latex PDF output > > does it by default, therefore would be nice if the FOP output did it > > too, without messing by the user. > > +1 Good approach. Many users after seeing the nice color syntax > highlighting in asciidoc to HTML output discover that FOP output does > not do it by default. If the need is standard and common, it makes sense > to integrate it in the workflow. > > Yet it will progress only if someone does the actual work. It's an > open-source world, remember.
GNU highlight's docbook output only does bold, italic, and optionally line numbering, but it's an improvement still over just copying the code. I can't into python, so I can't make it depend on FOP; but have a patch that enables it for all docbook output. http://pastebin.ca/2414793 - Lauri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
