i also got this reply from dblatex mail-list:

`dblatex -t pdf -b xetex yourinput.xml' should produce these glyphs in the 
pdf output just fine, no?
at least if you tell `dblatex' to use a font containing these glyphs. the 
standard font family (DejaVu) seems
not to contain them.

but I know for a fact the the `FreeType' fonts do. so install these and put

 <xsl:text>\setmainfont{FreeSe
rif}&#10;</xsl:text>
 <xsl:text>\setsansfont{FreeSans}&#10;</xsl:text>
 <xsl:text>\setmonofont{FreeMono}&#10;</xsl:text>

in your xsl user stylesheet (the one which you pass to dblatex with the 
`-p' option). as I have seen your question
on the asciidoc list as well: you might just copy the global 
asciidoc-dblatex.xsl to `~/.asciidoc' and edit it accordingly
if you are calling `dblatex' via `a2x'. I believe `a2x' will then recognize 
it.

hth
joerg


Em domingo, 30 de novembro de 2014 08h23min19s UTC-3, jvdh escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, 29 November 2014 23:13:42 UTC+1, Eduardo Santana wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm producing books for distance learning. And I would link to use 
> checkbox on activities. Does ant one know how to use checkbox with dblatex?
>
> - ☐ (hex: &#x2610; / dec: &#9744;): ballot box (empty, that's how it's 
> supposed to be)
> - ☑ (hex: &#x2611; / dec: &#9745;): ballot box with check
> - ☒ (hex: &#x2612; / dec: &#9746;): ballot box with x
> - ✓ (hex: &#x2713; / dec: &#10003;): check mark, equivalent to 
> `&checkmark`; and &check; in most browsers
> - ✔ (hex: &#x2714; / dec: &#10004;): heavy check mark
> - ✗ (hex: &#x2717; / dec: &#10007;): ballot x
> - ✘ (hex: &#x2718; / dec: &#10008;): heavy ballot x
>
>   the last four work for me even with the standard (pdftex) backend. the 
> first three require to use the xetex backend of dblatex. below are my notes 
> of a few years ago including a response from the dblatex maintainer. the 
> notes are now partly obsolete and are also (partly) MacOS specific but 
> maybe it helps: 
>  
>
> Use of special symbols and system font access under MacOS
>
>    Where there are empty cells in the glyph column of Table [19][tab:chars
> ],
>    this simply means that the used font does not contain the glyph. Glyphs
>    which appear as character codes in the glyph column simply are not (yet
> ?)
>    in the respective translation table (unient.py) from XML to LaTeX 
> which is
>    required when the default pdftex backend is used. The dblatex 
> maintainer
>    (Ben Guillon) clarified this issue:
>
>    There are two options:
>
>    1) either use the xetex backend that natively handles any Unicode
>    characters: dblatex -bxetex file.xml,
>
>    2) or patch the lib/dbtexmf/dblatex/unient.py with attached patch.
>
>    I recommend the first method, since the char mapping in traditional 
> latex
>    macros will never be complete and can have side effects.
>
>    The patch in unient.py looks like this:
>
>  +0x00398: r"\ensuremath{\Theta}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER THETA
>  +0x0039E: r"\ensuremath{\Xi}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER XI
>  +0x003A8: r"\ensuremath{\Psi}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER PSI
>  +0x003A9: r"\ensuremath{\Omega}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER OMEGA
>  +0x003D6: r"\ensuremath{\pi}", # GREEK PI SYMBOL
>  +0x02032: r"\ensuremath{'}", # PRIME
>  +0x02033: r"\ensuremath{''}", # DOUBLE PRIME
>  +0x02034: r"\ensuremath{'''}", # TRIPLE PRIME
>
>    With Macports unient.py currently resides in
>    /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2
> .7/site-packages/dbtexmf/dblatex
>
>    As of now, the following two symbols are defined there but do not work 
> and
>    cause the pdflatex backend to fail:
>
>  0x003B8: r"\texttheta{}", # GREEK SMALL LETTER THETA
>  0x003D1: r"\textvartheta{}", # GREEK THETA SYMBOL
>
>    which occur in Table [20][tab:chars] as:
>
>  |\θ |\θ (html only)   |θ |greek small letter theta
>  |\ϑ |\ϑ (html only)|ϑ |greek small letter theta symbol
>
>    XeTeX can cope with these, though.
>
>    Note For the time being this implies, that the current document 
> requires
>         XeTeX to be used for pdf generation.
>
>    The XeTeX route works only flawlessly when using fonts that
>    comprehensively support special symbols. I know of four suitable fonts:
>
>      * DejaVu (the dblatex -b xetex default choice)
>
>      * Cambria
>
>      * STIX ([21]http://www.stixfonts.org)
>
>      * GNU FreeFont ([22]http://www.gnu.org/software/freefont/index.html)
>
>    Only the last two of these (STIX and FreeFont) are truly complete
>    regarding glyphs (at least the coverage of the glyphs in Table
>    [23][tab:chars]) and styles (regular, italics, bold). Cambria has quite
>    complete glyph coverage, nearly as complete as Cambria Math (but, at 
> least
>    under MacOS Cambria Math does only provide the standard style, regular
> ).
>
>         The Nimbus Roman No9 L URW++ font which is essentially identical 
> to
>         Times Roman and chosen as default main font by dblatex when the
>         pdftex backend is used is a subset of STIX (restricted to latin1
>         coverage or similar). In other words: STIX looks essentially
>         indistinguishable from Nimbus/Times Roman as far as normal text is
>         concerned. This can be verified by typesetting the same document 
> via
>    Note the pdftex and the xetex backend, respectively. The only 
> discernible
>         difference is that line breaks sometimes (quite rarely) are
>         different. Maybe the kerning is
>
> ...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"asciidoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to