My solution was:

- edit lang.xsl file from dblatex
- add to ~/asciidoc/a2x.conf: DBLATEX_OPTS = '-b xetex'

I have edited `lang.xsl` like this:

<!--
<xsl:param name="xetex.font">
  <xsl:text>\setmainfont{DejaVu Serif}&#10;</xsl:text>
  <xsl:text>\setsansfont{DejaVu Sans}&#10;</xsl:text>
  <xsl:text>\setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}&#10;</xsl:text>
</xsl:param>
-->
<xsl:param name="xetex.font">
  <xsl:text>\setmainfont{FreeSerif}&#10;</xsl:text>
  <xsl:text>\setsansfont{FreeSans}&#10;</xsl:text>
  <xsl:text>\setmonofont{FreeMono}&#10;</xsl:text>
</xsl:param>


And I have added to my ~/asciidoc/a2x.conf:

DBLATEX_OPTS = '-b xetex'

I don't know what effect it will have using xetex instead of pdftex 
(default) :)

But it will be a problem of an other day :D

Thanks!

Em quarta-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2014 16h46min10s UTC-3, Eduardo Santana 
escreveu:
>
> i also got this reply from dblatex mail-list:
>
>
> `dblatex -t pdf -b xetex yourinput.xml' should produce these glyphs in the 
> pdf output just fine, no?
> at least if you tell `dblatex' to use a font containing these glyphs. the 
> standard font family (DejaVu) seems
> not to contain them.
>
> but I know for a fact the the `FreeType' fonts do. so install these and put
>
>  <xsl:text>\setmainfont{FreeSe
> rif}&#10;</xsl:text>
>  <xsl:text>\setsansfont{FreeSans}&#10;</xsl:text>
>  <xsl:text>\setmonofont{FreeMono}&#10;</xsl:text>
>
> in your xsl user stylesheet (the one which you pass to dblatex with the 
> `-p' option). as I have seen your question
> on the asciidoc list as well: you might just copy the global 
> asciidoc-dblatex.xsl to `~/.asciidoc' and edit it accordingly
> if you are calling `dblatex' via `a2x'. I believe `a2x' will then 
> recognize it.
>
> hth
> joerg
>
>
> Em domingo, 30 de novembro de 2014 08h23min19s UTC-3, jvdh escreveu:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, 29 November 2014 23:13:42 UTC+1, Eduardo Santana wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I'm producing books for distance learning. And I would link to use 
>> checkbox on activities. Does ant one know how to use checkbox with dblatex?
>>
>> - ☐ (hex: &#x2610; / dec: &#9744;): ballot box (empty, that's how it's 
>> supposed to be)
>> - ☑ (hex: &#x2611; / dec: &#9745;): ballot box with check
>> - ☒ (hex: &#x2612; / dec: &#9746;): ballot box with x
>> - ✓ (hex: &#x2713; / dec: &#10003;): check mark, equivalent to 
>> `&checkmark`; and &check; in most browsers
>> - ✔ (hex: &#x2714; / dec: &#10004;): heavy check mark
>> - ✗ (hex: &#x2717; / dec: &#10007;): ballot x
>> - ✘ (hex: &#x2718; / dec: &#10008;): heavy ballot x
>>
>>   the last four work for me even with the standard (pdftex) backend. the 
>> first three require to use the xetex backend of dblatex. below are my notes 
>> of a few years ago including a response from the dblatex maintainer. the 
>> notes are now partly obsolete and are also (partly) MacOS specific but 
>> maybe it helps: 
>>  
>>
>> Use of special symbols and system font access under MacOS
>>
>>    Where there are empty cells in the glyph column of Table [19][tab:
>> chars],
>>    this simply means that the used font does not contain the glyph. 
>> Glyphs
>>    which appear as character codes in the glyph column simply are not (
>> yet?)
>>    in the respective translation table (unient.py) from XML to LaTeX 
>> which is
>>    required when the default pdftex backend is used. The dblatex 
>> maintainer
>>    (Ben Guillon) clarified this issue:
>>
>>    There are two options:
>>
>>    1) either use the xetex backend that natively handles any Unicode
>>    characters: dblatex -bxetex file.xml,
>>
>>    2) or patch the lib/dbtexmf/dblatex/unient.py with attached patch.
>>
>>    I recommend the first method, since the char mapping in traditional 
>> latex
>>    macros will never be complete and can have side effects.
>>
>>    The patch in unient.py looks like this:
>>
>>  +0x00398: r"\ensuremath{\Theta}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER THETA
>>  +0x0039E: r"\ensuremath{\Xi}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER XI
>>  +0x003A8: r"\ensuremath{\Psi}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER PSI
>>  +0x003A9: r"\ensuremath{\Omega}", # GREEK CAPITAL LETTER OMEGA
>>  +0x003D6: r"\ensuremath{\pi}", # GREEK PI SYMBOL
>>  +0x02032: r"\ensuremath{'}", # PRIME
>>  +0x02033: r"\ensuremath{''}", # DOUBLE PRIME
>>  +0x02034: r"\ensuremath{'''}", # TRIPLE PRIME
>>
>>    With Macports unient.py currently resides in
>>    /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/
>> python2.7/site-packages/dbtexmf/dblatex
>>
>>    As of now, the following two symbols are defined there but do not 
>> work and
>>    cause the pdflatex backend to fail:
>>
>>  0x003B8: r"\texttheta{}", # GREEK SMALL LETTER THETA
>>  0x003D1: r"\textvartheta{}", # GREEK THETA SYMBOL
>>
>>    which occur in Table [20][tab:chars] as:
>>
>>  |\θ |\θ (html only)   |θ |greek small letter theta
>>  |\ϑ |\ϑ (html only)|ϑ |greek small letter theta symbol
>>
>>    XeTeX can cope with these, though.
>>
>>    Note For the time being this implies, that the current document 
>> requires
>>         XeTeX to be used for pdf generation.
>>
>>    The XeTeX route works only flawlessly when using fonts that
>>    comprehensively support special symbols. I know of four suitable fonts
>> :
>>
>>      * DejaVu (the dblatex -b xetex default choice)
>>
>>      * Cambria
>>
>>      * STIX ([21]http://www.stixfonts.org)
>>
>>      * GNU FreeFont ([22]http://www.gnu.org/software/freefont/index.html)
>>
>>    Only the last two of these (STIX and FreeFont) are truly complete
>>    regarding glyphs (at least the coverage of the glyphs in Table
>>    [23][tab:chars]) and styles (regular, italics, bold). Cambria has 
>> quite
>>    complete glyph coverage, nearly as complete as Cambria Math (but, at 
>> least
>>    under MacOS Cambria Math does only provide the standard style, regular
>> ).
>>
>>         The Nimbus Roman No9 L URW++ font which is essentially identical 
>> to
>>         Times Roman and chosen as default main font by dblatex when the
>>         pdftex backend is used is a subset of STIX (restricted to latin1
>>         coverage or similar). In other words: STIX looks essentially
>>         indistinguishable from Nimbus/Times Roman as far as normal text 
>> is
>>         concerned. This can be verified by typesetting the same document 
>> via
>>    Note the pdftex and the xetex backend, respectively. The only 
>> discernible
>>         difference is that line breaks sometimes (quite rarely) are
>>         different. Maybe the kerning is
>>
>> ...
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"asciidoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to