On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 09:06:42AM +1100, Lex Trotman wrote: > Hi Still works `a2x -k` on an exact copy of you initial post > > Valid: `/* ... */` > Not Valid: `/*` > Valid `*/` > > Valid: *`C/C++`* > Not Valid: *`C++`* or *C++* > > > gives docbook > > <simpara>Valid: <literal>/* ... */</literal> > Not Valid: <literal>/*</literal> > Valid <literal>*/</literal></simpara> > <simpara>Valid: <emphasis role="strong"><literal>C/C++</literal></emphasis> > Not Valid: <emphasis role="strong"><literal>C++</literal></emphasis> > or <emphasis role="strong">C++</emphasis></simpara> > > which looks right to me and the PDF dblatex makes looks to match. > Have you done some customising?
Mmmm really weird. Those combinations in a doc works flawlessly, and do not work in another... same compilation options. I have to investigate more... Sorry for the noise. I will report when I know more about... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. +------------------------+ | GNU/Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +------------------------+ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
