Hi people! On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:04:35PM +1000, Lex Trotman wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for starting the process. > [...] > > To me the point of the standardisation process is to ensure that > markup in a document is interpreted in the same way in all > implementations, and the semantics of that markup are the same, not > its presentation. Thats the core of the "Asciidoc is a semantic > markup, not a presentational markup" statement. > > So it seems to me that we need to standardise the syntax of Asciidoc > markup and to some extent the semantics, but not the output, and that > unfortunately makes it difficult to generate automated tests, however > I'm happy to hear solutions.
This is paramount for a number of reasons and I can add one: po4a supports asciidoc and a specification of the format (not of the output) is fundamental for the parsing and extracting of the .po strings process... TIA for this GREAT effort! -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ------------------------ GNU/Linux User #78271 FSFE fellow #364 ------------------------ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
