On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 03:29:24AM -0700, Jaime Tarrasa wrote: > > Almost a year ago, I asked about the Asciidoc Standard > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asciidoc/wj9kjl8gwC4/Ol5HA2RyDgAJ>, > because I'm writing a parser in Pascal. Since then, little has been done. > > Look at markua format, It is a good markup language. It has a clear > specification <http://markua.com/>: Elements structure, what is valid, what > is optional, what is compulsory, what is free for implementor, and > precedence of rules. It removes any ambiguity and solves any doubt. > > I have already implemented the full markua specification parser that > translates into FB2 and html (except courses stuff) > > In fact, I asked about specification already in 2016 > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asciidoc/5tJHg6UQAT0/BMaIB5EAAQAJ>. That > is over three years ago. I'm afraid that it means that specification is not > an issue for asciidoc/asciidoctor maintainers. The message *is "Use my > implementation. I will post changes in the list as they come out. Move on > and don't nitpick"*. Writing Asciidoc specification should be in the top of > your TODO list related to asciidoc. > > I don't think it is such a daunting task. You don't have to submit it to > ISO, just a clear webpage like markua. You, programmers, probably have a > draft of what attributes use, etc. just ordering, cleaning it up a little > and uploading to a webpage. >
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU... -- Best regards, Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ------------------------ GNU/Linux User #78271 FSFE fellow #364 ------------------------ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/asciidoc/20191024111729.GB29974%40marco-N24-25JU.
