Hi,
I've been using https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-latex and it
works (on *ubuntu 20.04), just had the following observations :
* it is based on asciidoctor not the traditional asciidoc
* inconsistencies between HTML rendering and PDF rendering when
escaping underscores in math context (one needs one backslash, the
other needs two, both reject the other option, not sure what it
should be anyway),
* some options in tables that normally work are ignored, like
left/right alignment
* the document style for PDF rendering is different from usual (based
on AMS style), so I could not use my regular style (made for and
used with the traditional asciidoc implementation)
This is only what I stumbled upon. I should probably make a short test
case for bullets 2 and 3 and report to authors.
Hope this helps.
-- Stéphane
Le 24/07/2020 à 20.16, mcp a écrit :
I'm looking into using something other than LaTex directly for writing
scientific papers. I'm considering org-mode and using their export to
latex to pdf feature. Does AsciiDoc have anything to compare?
MCP
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/asciidoc/ae32b2e5-6d77-04fa-1013-074db12de630%40gmail.com.
