This ML is currently for the original Asciidoc python, Asciidoctor discuss is https://discuss.asciidoctor.org/.
Cheers Lex On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 22:47, Stéphane Gourichon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been using https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-latex and it works > (on *ubuntu 20.04), just had the following observations : > > it is based on asciidoctor not the traditional asciidoc > inconsistencies between HTML rendering and PDF rendering when escaping > underscores in math context (one needs one backslash, the other needs two, > both reject the other option, not sure what it should be anyway), > some options in tables that normally work are ignored, like left/right > alignment > the document style for PDF rendering is different from usual (based on AMS > style), so I could not use my regular style (made for and used with the > traditional asciidoc implementation) > > This is only what I stumbled upon. I should probably make a short test case > for bullets 2 and 3 and report to authors. > > Hope this helps. > > -- Stéphane > > > Le 24/07/2020 à 20.16, mcp a écrit : > > I'm looking into using something other than LaTex directly for writing > scientific papers. I'm considering org-mode and using their export to latex > to pdf feature. Does AsciiDoc have anything to compare? > > > MCP > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/asciidoc/ae32b2e5-6d77-04fa-1013-074db12de630%40gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/asciidoc/CAKhWKDPS1gGvO7H%2Br6bP6ORH-HJTFkxQFhC3OoCv09QLRW%3D35Q%40mail.gmail.com.
