> Lex wrote: > I don't agree with Dan's assessment of a2x, if it works for you its fine to use, old doesn't mean bad, it hasn't changed much because it hasn't needed to.
I didn't mean to suggest old is bad. I'm simply suggesting that if you're looking to adopt a new tool, you should evaluate whether there's a more modern option that has kept up with the developments in the DocBook toolchain. What we do know is that a2x hasn't been updated that much. But if it works for someone, and no updates were needed, by all means use it. -Dan -- Dan Allen (he, him, his) | @mojavelinux | https://twitter.com/mojavelinux -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/asciidoc/CAKeHnO6KtJ%3DHikc0SJsLPzyxhw0F8OZiUr%2BmhDvTusNcjvCw-Q%40mail.gmail.com.
