james anderson writes: > > 5. asdf-output-locations > > > > a. desirable? > > b. contrib versus integral > > c. configuration > > i would very much like it to be an optional, configurable > contribution rather than part of the core implementation.
I have sympathy with making it optional (in fact, I argued for turning asdf-binary-locations into a contrib rather than merging way back.) However: Isn't asdf-output-locations somewhat like a CL pendant to `make install' if you squint your eyes? Shouldn't that be an integral part of ASDF? -T. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
