On 2010-02-02, at 22:48 , Robert Goldman wrote: > On 2/2/10 Feb 2 -11:39 AM, james anderson wrote: >> >> On 2010-02-02, at 18:17 , Faré wrote: > >>>> (c) Asdf binary locations / asdf output locations >>> ABL was already merged into ASDF by gwking. While I think it was a >>> generally good move, it fails (b), and I think can and should be >>> redone better. >> >> then, once asdf is configurable, is there any reason to not take abl >> out of the core? > > Can you explain what is meant, exactly, by "take abl out of the core"?
none of the respective functions or variables are defined if just asdf.lisp is loaded. > For that matter, I don't know what "configurable" means in this > context. > "Reads an init file"? It was always configurable in the sense that I > could load my asdf:*central-registry*, and I developed several > utilities > for configuring ASDF using only this rudimentary facility. > > I'm not sure I follow this. I certainly do /not/ want to see us > revert > to the days when asdf-binary-locations was a separate download. if by 'separate download' you mean a separate file, why not? if your requirement is, that it be in the same tar package, that makes sense. > > I'm not trying to be a nitpicker here; I just want to avoid us talking > by each other in case we don't agree about these terms. > > best, > r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
