On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: > I just released ASDF 1.600 in the official repository.
Please do not feel offended by the following: I am grateful that ASDF is moving so quickly. However, for the future, I think you should avoid by all means the word "release" and "release numbers" that are approaching the hundred-ths. There is no way for unknowledgeable users nor busy implementors to find milestones or real _releases_ that we should ship with our implementations. Maybe if the next release is ASDF 2.0 one should begin thinking on a different numbering, distinguishing individual sets of fixes pushed via git from monthly releases that aim at broader testing -- by that I mean with something like http://ecls.sf.net/logs.html but replacing platforms with implementations. I would not mind help on the latter at some point, but commercial implementations would be out of my reach. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
