On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: > I still would recommend 1.601 as it is an "official" release (whatever > that means) whereas 1.596 isn't. >
Thanks. That is all I was asking for. > Note that ECL passes tests, if only I tell the test suite to not worry > about the warnings ECL issues while compiling asdf.lisp. It is > probably a bug in ECL that it should issue these warnings: plenty of > unused variable warnings for variables used while dispatching methods, > warnings about an unused variables CLOS::.GENERIC-FUNCTION.SI::TEMP as > introduced by ECL itself in some macro. Also annoying notes about > .COMBINED-METHOD-ARGS. was undefined. Compiler assumes it is a global. > Unknown type (VALUES &REST T) > And one about ECL expecting two arguments from unintern. > The problem with ignoring warnings from ECL is that, though I ignore > bogus warnings now, I may be ignoring valid warnings tomorrow. I was aware of some of those warnings (.combined-method-args., *next-method*), as reported by other users and now fixed in the upcoming release, but not of others (temp?). In this case you should have immediately reported that problem so that I look at it, which I will do before the next release. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
