On 3/23/10 Mar 23 -8:01 PM, james anderson wrote: > > On 2010-03-24, at 00:08 , Robert Goldman wrote: > >> On 3/23/10 Mar 23 -8:35 AM, james anderson wrote: >>> good morning; >>> >>> On 2010-03-18, at 21:41 , Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: >>>
.... >> >> The :class case, I'll grant you, /does/ make sense, but I'm not >> confident we should extrapolate too far from that. > > if one would go through each initialization argument and consider the > implications of each, i would be more inclined to believe. Right. Let me be a bit more specific. Any time I have to devote to ASDF between now and a hopefully soon-to-come version 2, is going to be sucked up in my launchpad backlog (especially the documentation items), which sadly seems to be monotonically increasing in size. So if you or someone else on the list were to do that pass over the initialization arguments and, say, put them into a table with rows for arguments and columns for, say, source-file, (internal) module, and system, it would be hugely helpful. I understand, of course, that you have already contributed hugely to the project, and you have your own life to lead, so it might well not be feasible for you. Best, Robert _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
