On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote: > I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, > etc. > ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the > implementation, and from it to the OS.
Question: if ".." is handled by the OS, does that mean it may not be portable (especially on Windows)? If so, do we need a native-to-ASDF way to specify a (:relative :up) or (:relative :back) pathname with a string? thanks, r > > Paths are relative to the parent's pathname's directory. > > [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] > Theists think all gods but theirs are false. Atheists simply don't make an > exception for the last one. > > > > > On 25 May 2010 11:24, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: >> What's the right syntax for specifying a relative pathname for a module >> whose files should live in the parent directory instead of in a >> subdirectory? >> >> E.g., if I have >> >> (:module foo >> :components ((:file "bar") (:file "baz")) >> :pathname ???? >> ) >> >> what goes in there if I do NOT want the files to live in foo/, but with >> all the other files? >> >> I could put a FAQ about this in the manual... >> >> best, >> r >> >> _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
