On 5/26/10 May 26 -9:35 AM, Faré wrote: > On 26 May 2010 09:18, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: >> On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote: >>> I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, >>> etc. >>> ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the >>> implementation, and from it to the OS. >> >> I added a test that verifies that "" works as a pathname component. I >> wasn't sure that it would work for ACL, and wanted to verify for my >> satisfaction. >> >> I'd like to push the new test (no change to asdf.lisp). Is that OK with >> you? >> > Yes. Please commit new tests that you have. > > Pending ASDF 2 release, I'd like to discourage code changes, but to > encourage test and documentation improvements. > > [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] > If you could ask a unique question to a computer during a Turing test, > what would you ask? > — Douglas Hofstadter, Metamagical Themas
OK, I have just pushed the new test definition (I'd like to encourage everyone who can to run it and make sure it passes --- as much to test for bugs in the test as in ASDF), and also some mods to the pathnames discussion in the texinfo file. cheers, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
