On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > is it OK with you if unbundle asdf-ecl from asdf.asd, and instead create > a somewhat portable asdf extension called asdf-bundle.asd ?
I would need some time to do that -- this means not before the next release. What bundle operations make sense in other implementations? Concatenating FASLs seems to work in SBCL (at least last time I tried), but that, CLISP and CCL are about the implementations I have. One thing that worries me about unbundling it is that being an extension, ECL users no longer have it by default -- they have to make an extra effort. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
