Faré <[email protected]> writes: >>> I intend to release 2.27 next week. Can people test on their systems >>> and their implementations? >>> >>> Xach, are things all clear with Quicklisp now? >> >> There is an unusual issue with the "periods" library that I can't quite >> puzzle out. It does not have any trouble with ASDF 2.26, but it fails to >> load from FASL, under some circumstances, with the latest commit to >> master. It seems like something in my build environment is triggering >> it, but I can't reproduce it reliably enough to figure it out. >> >> I'll keep you posted. >> > Do you logs of some of these failures? Maybe I can reproduce at home, > or, looking at the .asd and knowing what I changed, figure a scenario > that explains the failure.
http://report.quicklisp.org/periods/2012-12-12/failtail.txt is the typical failure log. The use of the SERIES package is conditionalized on the :PERIODS-USE-SERIES feature, and I can't find any place where that is in effect. Zach _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
