Also, I'd like to know if any package in Quicklisp relies on some ASDF internals I'd like to rename. This is especially harder when users define methods on a generic function — you can't rename the function, then. Is there an easy way to download EVERYTHING (excluding old versions) so I may grep the results?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. — H.L. Mencken On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Zach Beane <[email protected]> wrote: > Faré <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> I intend to release 2.27 next week. Can people test on their systems >>>> and their implementations? >>>> >>>> Xach, are things all clear with Quicklisp now? >>> >>> There is an unusual issue with the "periods" library that I can't quite >>> puzzle out. It does not have any trouble with ASDF 2.26, but it fails to >>> load from FASL, under some circumstances, with the latest commit to >>> master. It seems like something in my build environment is triggering >>> it, but I can't reproduce it reliably enough to figure it out. >>> >>> I'll keep you posted. >>> >> Do you logs of some of these failures? Maybe I can reproduce at home, >> or, looking at the .asd and knowing what I changed, figure a scenario >> that explains the failure. > > http://report.quicklisp.org/periods/2012-12-12/failtail.txt is the > typical failure log. The use of the SERIES package is conditionalized on > the :PERIODS-USE-SERIES feature, and I can't find any place where that > is in effect. > > Zach _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
