On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Zach Beane <[email protected]> wrote: > Faré <[email protected]> writes: > >>>> OK, so I've put in the archives/ directory of asdf a few tarballs. See: >>>> http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/archives/ >>>> >>> Would you consider adding an URL like asdf-driver-latest.tgz that will >>> always refer to the latest version? >>> >> Done: >> >> (defun link-archive () >> (run `(ln -sf ,(tarname (driver-name)) >> (,*clnet-asdf-public* "archives/asdf-driver.tar.gz")) >> :show t :host *clnet*) >> (values)) >> >> While I'm at it, a present for foom, 2.26.119 will do its best >> to avoid resolving pathnames at all if *resolve-symlinks* is nil >> (please test with your setting). > > Does it also fix the issue with the asdf-utils package name conflict? > Which way do you want the conflict resolved? The current resolution is that asdf-utils.asd is an empty system that depends on asdf-driver.asd, and asdf-driver has the nickname asdf-utils, and exports about everything useful that asdf-utils used to; I omitted a few things that have changed name, but I can provide compatibility functions with the previous backward API if there's a demand.
If you think it's nicer to NOT have the same name, and/or to have asdf-utils a proxy package that imports and re-exports select symbols from asdf-driver, everything is possible. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Fraud is the homage that force pays to reason. — Charles Curtis _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
