On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Zach Beane <[email protected]> wrote: > By the way, this steady stream of "oops, ooops, oops, oops", is causing > me a huge, huge, huge headache. > My apologies. I've been focusing so much on ASDF that I forgot to update all the systems I maintain that indirectly depend on it. Now (only) I've added an automated test that all these systems can still load correctly.
> The short life of asdf-utils is causing me a huge headache. > asdf-utils still exists. Now it's just a thin wrapper over asdf-driver. I broke it briefly, thinking it had no clients (none showing in quicklisp); I didn't you of all people were using it, after your complaining that asdf should export utilities at all. > The incompatibilities introduced in ASDF are causing me a huge headache. > I've been working hard to resolve them. There's no way the old ASDF could be fixed without a complete rewrite, and that was bound to introduce some minor incompatibilities, especially in cases where clients software were exploiting unsupported interfaces or outright bugs. > This is a very annoying mess from my perspective. I haven't really > gotten a grip on what the benefits are to make this (temporary?) pain > worth it. > I'll publish a feature update shortly. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it. — Stephen Leacock. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
