On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodono...@yandex.ru> wrote: > 01.02.2013, 23:23, "Faré" <fah...@gmail.com>: >> After discussion with people on #lisp and via private chat, I decided >> to use a shorter name. Here is what was released in 2.27: >> >> :long-name "Another System Definition Facility" >> :homepage "http://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/"; >> :bug-tracker "https://launchpad.net/asdf/"; >> :mailto "asdf-devel@common-lisp.net" >> :source-control (:git "git://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/asdf.git") > > Another useful slot would be :purpose, it could specify what the library is: > web server, db client, image processing library, data-structures library, etc. > > The values in this slots are tags from some specified taxonomy. To avoid > creating the taxonomy > from scratch we could start for example with the tag tree from cl-user.net. > > In in the future we could want to improve the taxonomy. If the new improved > taxonomy > is incompatible with the old one, we can then introduce new slot, :purpose2, > specifying that it can hold values from new taxonomy. > > I think this is an idea for future, it's probably too big to be in the scope > of ASDF3 >s Why not. And if some people end up actually using component-property for such useful purpose, or otherwise make successful use of it, I am willing to reconsider the deprecation of component-property, and/or my successor will.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org No matter what language you use, a Sufficiently Smart Compiler(TM) will be able to find an efficient implementation for whatever apparently difficult problem you specify. However, a Sufficiently Smart Compiler(TM) for arbitrary problems is itself an AI-complete problem. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
