02.02.2013, 05:29, "Faré" <fah...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodono...@yandex.ru> wrote: > >> 01.02.2013, 23:23, "Faré" <fah...@gmail.com>: >>> After discussion with people on #lisp and via private chat, I decided >>> to use a shorter name. Here is what was released in 2.27: >>> >>> :long-name "Another System Definition Facility" >>> :homepage "http://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/"; >>> :bug-tracker "https://launchpad.net/asdf/"; >>> :mailto "asdf-devel@common-lisp.net" >>> :source-control (:git "git://common-lisp.net/projects/asdf/asdf.git") >> Another useful slot would be :purpose, it could specify what the library is: >> web server, db client, image processing library, data-structures library, >> etc. >> >> The values in this slots are tags from some specified taxonomy. To avoid >> creating the taxonomy >> from scratch we could start for example with the tag tree from cl-user.net. >> >> In in the future we could want to improve the taxonomy. If the new improved >> taxonomy >> is incompatible with the old one, we can then introduce new slot, >> :purpose2, >> specifying that it can hold values from new taxonomy. >> >> I think this is an idea for future, it's probably too big to be in the >> scope of ASDF3 >> s > > Why not. And if some people end up actually using component-property > for such useful purpose, or otherwise make successful use of it, I am > willing to reconsider the deprecation of component-property, and/or my > successor will.
Maybe it's clear already, but I am not arguing for/against component-property. Just share this idea because it is now being discussed what metadata attributes are useful. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
