08.02.2013, 01:43, "Robert Goldman" <[email protected]>: > On 2/7/13 Feb 7 -3:36 PM, Anton Vodonosov wrote: > >> 08.02.2013, 01:34, "Robert Goldman" <[email protected]>: >>> I'm still not following you. If I have a stale copy of ASDF that came >>> with my implementation, and I load it, >> No, you do not load stale version. > > Is this always achievable? > > I don't know enough about the range of implementations to know if it's > always possible to avoid loading a stale ASDF. > > Is there any case where the implementation uses ASDF enough that one > must load ASDF in order to get the implementation into a position where > it can load Quicklisp?
I haven't tested all the implementations. Fare told me once that he is not aware of any implementation that loads ASDF without you explicitly doing a (require "asdf"). _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
