On 2/7/13 Feb 7 -3:56 PM, Anton Vodonosov wrote: > 08.02.2013, 01:43, "Robert Goldman" <[email protected]>: >> On 2/7/13 Feb 7 -3:36 PM, Anton Vodonosov wrote: >> >>> 08.02.2013, 01:34, "Robert Goldman" <[email protected]>: >>>> I'm still not following you. If I have a stale copy of ASDF that came >>>> with my implementation, and I load it, >>> No, you do not load stale version. >> >> Is this always achievable? >> >> I don't know enough about the range of implementations to know if it's >> always possible to avoid loading a stale ASDF. >> >> Is there any case where the implementation uses ASDF enough that one >> must load ASDF in order to get the implementation into a position where >> it can load Quicklisp? > > I haven't tested all the implementations. Fare told me once that > he is not aware of any implementation that loads ASDF without you explicitly > doing a (require "asdf"). >
If I do a (require <FOO>) for <FOO> some internally supplied library of SBCL, doesn't that trigger the use of ASDF to load <FOO>? Best, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
