> it is time that I declare this simultaneous change > towards checking deferred > warnings as a failure.
i haven't experimented much with this infrastructure, so take it with a piece of salt... but maybe there's a middle ground, where the new warnings get printed but the load/compile is not forced to fail? or that's the case already? -- attila Notice the erosion of your (digital) freedom, and do something about it! PGP: 2FA1 A9DC 9C1E BA25 A59C 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39 _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
