On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Attila Lendvai <[email protected]> wrote: >> it is time that I declare this simultaneous change >> towards checking deferred >> warnings as a failure. > > > i haven't experimented much with this infrastructure, so take it with > a piece of salt... but maybe there's a middle ground, where the new > warnings get printed but the load/compile is not forced to fail? or > that's the case already? > Well, the checking obeys *compile-file-warnings-behaviour* and *compile-file-failure-behaviour*, so it will only cause the build to fail when there is a full warning, on SBCL and MKCL.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org In a five year period we can get one superb programming language. Only we can't control when the five year period will begin. — Alan Perlis _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
