fasciculus is nice (small package in latin) But one-package-per-file is nicer. *If* there's going to be a renaming, I'd vote for that, without a -system suffix: asdf/one-package-per-file.lisp (defsystem foo :class :one-package-per-file ...)
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org What is mind? No matter! What is matter? Never mind! — Bertrand Russell's Grand Mother, In Karl Popper, The Unended Quest On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alastair Bridgewater <alastair.bridgewa...@gmail.com> wrote: > For what it's worth, I always thought of the style as being > one-package-per-file, but I called the build system that I developed around > it "quick build" for a completely unrelated reason. > > I would suggest not calling it "quick-build", but other than that I'm not > sure that I care. > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon > <p...@informatimago.com> wrote: >> >> On 16 Apr 2014, at 00:00, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Before the release is the best time for renaming things. If you have a >> suggestion for a better name, now is the time to speak, not later. >> >> >> fasciculus >> >> (Since we have alexandria and cesarum, we could go on…) >> >> — >> __Pascal Bourguignon__ >> > _______________________________________________ Asdf-devel mailing list Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
