FWIW, I also think that one-package-per-file is nicer, and better than anything else I have heard. So if my vote counts and we are voting shortly, that is likely what I would go with.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > fasciculus is nice (small package in latin) > But one-package-per-file is nicer. *If* there's going to be a > renaming, I'd vote for that, without a -system suffix: > asdf/one-package-per-file.lisp > (defsystem foo :class :one-package-per-file ...) > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org > What is mind? No matter! What is matter? Never mind! > — Bertrand Russell's Grand Mother, In Karl Popper, The Unended Quest > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alastair Bridgewater > <alastair.bridgewa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> For what it's worth, I always thought of the style as being >> one-package-per-file, but I called the build system that I developed around >> it "quick build" for a completely unrelated reason. >> >> I would suggest not calling it "quick-build", but other than that I'm not >> sure that I care. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon >> <p...@informatimago.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 16 Apr 2014, at 00:00, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Before the release is the best time for renaming things. If you have a >>> suggestion for a better name, now is the time to speak, not later. >>> >>> >>> fasciculus >>> >>> (Since we have alexandria and cesarum, we could go on…) >>> >>> — >>> __Pascal Bourguignon__ >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Asdf-devel mailing list > Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel _______________________________________________ Asdf-devel mailing list Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
