On 11/18/15 Nov 18 -8:35 PM, Faré wrote: > Yeah, there's an awkward merge or rebase happening when "stable" jumps > from 3.1 to 3.2, whereas no such jump happens if old branches have > numbered names and are forked off a master that keeps going forward. >
Surely git must have a solution to this problem? There must be a ton of projects that need to have a "stable" and a "development" branch. So this must arise all over the place.... Anyone know?
