On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: > Question: shouldn't I add this as > > (deftype FATAL-CONDITION ...) > > and try to use that everywhere, instead of writing duplicate code > everywhere? That would also solve the "lists in match-condition-p" problem. > Indeed, that's an even better factorization.
> I think the CCL folks agree that it was a mistake to make PROCESS-RESET > a SERIOUS-CONDITION, but we have to live with it. > Yes. That's a good reason to export fatal-condition from uiop/image, since it's a generally useful abstraction perfectly fit for the purposes of uiop. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy. — David Brooks, "The Necessity of Atheism"
