On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: > On 7/28/16 Jul 28 -10:47 PM, Faré wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Robert P. Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> >> wrote: > > Hmmmm..... Actually, SERIOUS-CONDITION, as I read its documentation, is > exactly the right abstraction -- it's just that CCL has broken it: > > "All conditions serious enough to require interactive intervention..." > > I don't want to export a new concept that is "Like SERIOUS-CONDITION, > except patched for an implementation." > > I'll fix this internal to ASDF and leave it at that. Some day I hope > that FATAL-CONDITION will wither away. > By that token, all of UIOP would be private, hoping that someday the CL standard would fix pathnames, etc.
The whole point of UIOP is to provide ASDF and other CL programs with portability abstractions that actually work in the current CL landscape. Not to pretend that that CL landscape magically matches some imagined ideal when that isn't the case. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org We are always in anarchy. But we pay a hefty price maintaining the illusion that we aren't, and another one being misled by the illusion.
