On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Claude Beaudoin > <jean.claude.beaud...@gmail.com> wrote: > (...) > > >> I believe it's a bug in MKCL, maybe specifically in command line > >> processing. > >> Can you fix it? > > > > Looks more like a ill-advised feature than a bug, that I can surely > > fix/improve > > to better satisfaction. I am investigating... > > > Definitely a bug. Only serious-condition's should cause mkcl to abort > if unhandled. >
The fix I intend for this bug is currently on MKCL's github repo master head. Please give it a try. > > >> Should I add some backward compatibility for older versions of MKCL, > >> or is it superfluous? > > > > Not sure yet. I'll tell you with the fix. > I don't see what could be done at a reasonable cost, so I would simply let it go and point the latest and greatest to whoever stumbles on this. > > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• > http://fare.tunes.org > Perhaps those of us who care about quality programs have not spoken up > often > enough — `for bad programs to triumph requires only that good programmers > remain silent.' I call this passivity the `Silence of the Lambdas.' — > hbaker > Probably your best footer quote ever!
