On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Faré <f...@tunes.org> wrote: > Regarding these ASDF failures on MKCL: > * test-program was a bug in my latest ASDF tweaks, now fixes. > * test-bundle and test3 smell like another case where MKCL errors out > due to non-serious conditions being signalled, this time inside a > require. >
It does smell fishy in that area now that you mention it. Investigating... > * test-defsystem-depends-on-phase-overlap.script is because said test > tries to undefine a class using > (setf (find-class 'asdf::my-cl-source-file) nil) > and MKCL disapproves, unlike all other tested CL implementations, erroring > with: > "TEST ABORTED: NIL is not of type SI:INSTANCE." > Is that a compliant way to undefine a class? If not, is there one and > what is it? > This is clearly a bug in MKCL! Your attempt at undefining a class is directly in line with "Issue SETF-FIND-CLASS Writeup" annexed to the ANSI-CL standard.
