Can you anonymize it and send it? Or extract a minimal failure case? I can't reproduce at home, nor imagine what could be happening.
Anton, could you test the syntax-control branch with cl-test-grid, and grep the results for expansions of the format string "Computing just-done stamp in plan ~S for action ~S, but dependency ~S wasn't done yet!" ? —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Mathematics is as little a science as grammar is a language. — Ernst Mayr On Wed, Oct 18, 2017, 08:11 Stas Boukarev <stass...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's a work file, can't publish it. But it's just a defsystem with depends-on > and components. > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:46 PM Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It's hard to tell without seeing the .asd file. The message says that >> you completed the load-op of the system, but somehow you never did the >> define-op of the system (the new action that tracks the loading of >> .asd files so that defsystem-depends-on can be properly staged). >> >> Can you tell us more about the "non-complicated" features that you >> use? Do you follow the "best practices" document? >> https://github.com/fare/asdf/blob/master/doc/best_practices.md >> >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• >> http://fare.tunes.org >> Don't forget your daily prayer to Baah-kup, >> the God of data storage and recovery! >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Stas Boukarev <stass...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > More new warnings from ASDF 3.3, this time I have no idea what it means. >> > >> > WARNING: >> > Computing just-done stamp in plan NIL for action >> > (ASDF/LISP-ACTION:LOAD-OP >> > "system"), but >> > dependency (ASDF/FIND-SYSTEM:DEFINE-OP >> > >> > "system") wasn't done yet! >> > >> > The .asd file is not public, but it looks perfectly normal without using >> > any >> > complicated features.