ASDF keeps inventing good reasons all the time... On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:43 PM Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, is it a case where you're insisting on using a secondary system > name that doesn't follow the convention B/A when the primary system is > B ? That might explain it. There is also a warning against such a > thing, and for good reason. > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• > http://fare.tunes.org > Doing well is the result of doing good. That's what capitalism is all > about. > — Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882) > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Stas Boukarev <stass...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > cat b.asd > > (defsystem A) > > > > (defsystem B > > :depends-on (A)) > > > > (asdf:load-system 'b) is enough to trigger it. > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:51 PM Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> See section 4 of the ASDF 3.3 paper at ILC 2017 for a quick overview: > >> https://github.com/fare/asdf2017 > >> > >> To support proper phase separation, ASDF has a new operation, > >> define-op, that tracks the dependencies of loading a .asd file (i.e. > >> other systems you operate on, e.g., via load-system or > >> defsystem-depends-on, etc.) > >> > >> I don't know exactly what is your system A and how you use it, but > >> apparently it's unhappy about depending on the primary system for > >> define-op yet being earlier in the .asd file, so the other system > >> hasn't been defined yet. > >> > >> Maybe ASDF should refrain from registering a dependency here between > >> sibling systems. Or not. It was quite subtle to debug about a year > >> ago, and it fell out of my working cache. > >> > >> Is there anything special you do between A and B except a :depends-on ? > >> > >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• > >> http://fare.tunes.org > >> You think war is economically beneficial? Then why share those benefits > >> with > >> dirty foreigners? Let's have a civil war — A war we're sure to win! > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Stas Boukarev <stass...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > It’s a regular depends-on, but why did it work before without > problems? > >> > > >> > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 18:32 Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Stas Boukarev <stass...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > B is primary, but A has to be loaded before it. It precedes B, and > B > >> >> > depends > >> >> > on it. > >> >> > > >> >> If it's a regular :depends-on, then B should be able to appear before > >> >> A, and that should actually work better. > >> >> > >> >> If it's a :defsystem-depends-on, it used to be that A must be before > >> >> B, but the new situation is that they have to be in separate files > for > >> >> define-op to work at all. > >> >> > >> >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• > >> >> http://fare.tunes.org > >> >> For ultimately, the most visible trait of a just man is to have no > >> >> desire > >> >> at all to rule others, and only want to rule himself. This decides > >> >> everything. In other words, the worst people will rule. — Alain > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:23 PM Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Stas Boukarev < > stass...@gmail.com> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > Looks like this happens because I have two systems in B.asd, A > and > >> >> >> > B, > >> >> >> > and B > >> >> >> > depends on A. > >> >> >> Maybe changing the order of the two systems will help. > >> >> >> Which is primary? Which depends on the other? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• > >> >> >> http://fare.tunes.org > >> >> >> All honest people are welcome to come and live here. > >> >> >> All dishonest people are welcome to come and die here. > >> >> >> — Libertarian Open-Borders, Open-Skulls Policy >
