On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:13 PM Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote:
> I have a library that provides DEF-UNIMPLEMENTED as a macro for defining > stub functions. When you compile a file with unimplemented functions, you > get a warning of the type FOO:UNIMPLEMENTED-STUB in my library FOO. > > I'd like to put in an asdf system definition a file spec something like > this: > > (:file "file-with-stubs" > :method (:around (o c) (handler-bind ((foo:unimplemented-stub > #'(lambda (c) > (print c) > (muffle-warning c)) > (call-next-method))) > > but, of course, the package foo doesn't exist when this is read (although > I could put (asdf:load-system "foo") upstream of the enclosing defsystem). > > This isn't a case that's nicely consistent with Faré's hack for > translating strings or keyword symbols, nor does it seem easy to use > find-symbol for this purpose. > You could still use FIND-SYMBOL: (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c) (when (typep c (find-symbol x :foo)))))) (a))