I think there is a problem with the :around method approach - it is not safe for an ASDF extension to define methods on ASDF's operations/components, because other ASDF extensions may want to do the same thing. Imagine there is CFFI* and I want to use both CFFI and CFFI*.
- A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Faré
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Faré
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Robert Goldman
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Robert Goldman
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Robert Goldman
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Robert Goldman
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Faré
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Faré
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov
- Re: A CFFI -ASDF integration bug Ilya Perminov