François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait: > Before it can be ignored, it must be defined. And so as to define it, > its class must be defined. I suppose we could have some error class > that it used when the class it not defined, that would only trigger an > error at runtime if the feature is true. I'm sure the current / next > sucker^W maintainer will accept patches.
Not a big deal. I just thought that since everything in that form are keywords (so no read-time problem, as opposed to parsing sb-grovel:grovel-constants-file), perhaps the intended behavior was different. So in the end, it seems that there's very little (if at all) to be gained by using :if-feature to conditionalize on implementation type. -- ¡En Seguida! -- New album: https://www.didierverna.com/records/en-seguida.php Available on all digital platforms now! Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info
